Lighttpd和Nginx 性能测试 处理静态文件和图片文件测试

Lighttpd和Nginx 性能测试 处理静态文件和图片文件测试

本次测试都采用正式发行版 服务器内存为1gb  使用ApacheBench

安装编译 都一样

  ./configure
make
make install
 

lighttpd -f /etc/lighttpd/lighttpd.conf
And for Nginx:
/usr/local/nginx/sbin/nginx

Two files were used for testing purposes:

• index.html (356 bytes)
• test.png (313 kilobytes)

Each file was accessed 100,000 times. For index.html concurrency was set to 1000, and 10 for test.png. Keepalive was not used.

测试结果

index.html:

	Nginx	Lighttpd
Concurrency Level:	1000	1000
Time taken for tests (seconds):	12.445774	10.951389
Complete requests:	100000	100000
Failed requests:	0	0
Write errors:	0	0
Total transferred (bytes):	56779947	62353634
HTML transferred (bytes):	35650196	35687932
Requests per second [#/sec] (mean):	8034.86	9131.26
Time per request [ms] (mean) :	124.458	109.514
Time per request [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests):	0.124	0.110
Transfer rate [Kbytes/sec] received :	4455.25	5560.21

test.png

	Nginx	Lighttpd
Concurrency Level:	10	10
Time taken for tests (seconds):	52.889986	54.976213
Complete requests:	100000	100000
Failed requests:	0	0
Write errors:	0	0
Total transferred (bytes):	32067859584	32070273152
HTML transferred (bytes):	32046457872	32045670938
Requests per second [#/sec] (mean):	1890.72	1818.97
Time per request [ms] (mean) :	5.289	5.498
Time per request [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests):	0.529	0.550
Transfer rate [Kbytes/sec] received :	592102.06	569675.94

Conclusion

Both servers performed extremely well, though it seems that Lighttpd might perform best in a more fragmented file system (smaller files). Nginx performed better serving test.png, but the difference is smaller than the preceeding test.

Considering that each would easily saturate the pipeline I doubt a real-world performance difference would be seen.